Unreal Engine's Challenges and Alternatives for Mobile Game Development

---

I have been an Unreal Engine user for a year now. Initially, the potential it offered was exciting, but as time went by, I realized that it might not be the best fit for mobile game development eavors. The lack of resources and proper guidance on how to publish games in app stores such as Apple's App Store or Google Play Store is one major frustration.

For instance, there are no comprehensive guides avlable regarding what additional permissions are required when publishing a game on Google Play Store. Similarly, integrating rewarded ads into an Unreal Engine project presents significant challenges due to the lack of detled documentation. for using in-app purchases also seems convoluted and isn't well explned in their extensive resources.

Moreover, there's inconsistency when it comes to updating features that are relevant to mobile developers. For example, the support for WebGL was deprecated at version 4.24, which can be a setback considering its importance in web-based applications or platforms.

Let's address these issues step-by-step:

1. Permissions and App Store Guidelines: While Unreal Engine doesn't offer detled instructions on what permissions are required when publishing to app stores such as Google Play, it might be advisable to seek out community forums or specific developer groups for insights on common requirements.

2. Rewarded Ads Integration: Given the complexity and lack of clear documentation regarding rewarded ads in Unreal Engine, a potential workaround could involve using third-party tools designed specifically for this purpose that can integrate seamlessly with Unreal.

3. In-App Purchases Guidance: Although official documentation might not be detled on how to best implement IAPs, there are numerous online resources and community solutions avlable where developers share their experiences and tips.

4. WebGL Support: The removal of WebGL support at version 4.24 might have been a strategic move by Unreal Engine, as it pushes users towards more native web technologies like WebAssembly or WebGPU which provide better performance on client-side platforms. However, this could be seen as a negative point for developers relying heavily on WebGL's capabilities.

Alternative suggestions:

• Consider Unity: If C# is preferred over C++, Unity offers robust support for mobile development and app store submission processes. It might be easier to navigate through the various tools and resources provided by Unity specifically med at mobile game developers.

• Godot Engine: For developers who prefer using C++, Godot provides a comprehensive set of tools tlored towards creating both 2D and 3D games, offering detled guides on mobile development that can address many of the issues mentioned above.

It's essential for Unreal Engine to consider these points when updating their documentation or feature sets. This could potentially attract more developers to choose it as their primary game engine for mobile projects by providing clearer guidance and support where it matters most.

In , while Unreal Engine is a powerful tool with immense potential, its application in the mobile gaming industry might require additional resources or alternative strategies due to certn limitations highlighted above.
This article is reproduced from: https://forums.unrealengine.com/t/why-unreal-engine-is-so-bad-not-recommended-for-mobile-developers/1591131#:~:text=They%20say%2C%20Unreal%20Engine%20based,users%20to%20install%20big%20games.

Please indicate when reprinting from: https://www.05aq.com/Page_Game/Unreal_Engine_Mobile_Development_Challenges.html